Route across providers
Choose from available ground, relay, RF, optical, or partner paths based on mission policy instead of wiring every mission to one vendor.
OffWorld Grid is a future commercial network layer for missions that cross clouds, ground stations, satellites, relays, lunar infrastructure, surface networks, and deep-space links. It does not try to own every antenna or constellation. It makes the pieces behave like one network.
Space communications are becoming a multi-provider environment. The hard software problem is orchestration: identity, route selection, contact planning, storage, priorities, failover, edge compute, data policy, observability, and billing across links that may not exist at the same moment.
Choose from available ground, relay, RF, optical, or partner paths based on mission policy instead of wiring every mission to one vendor.
When a link disappears, data waits at a trusted node instead of failing because the destination is not currently reachable.
Cache, filter, prioritize, compress, and synchronize near spacecraft, relay, habitat, or surface endpoints to avoid wasting scarce links.
Let operators request service intent — priority, delivery deadline, security, destination, budget — while the grid handles path execution.
The network has to behave differently in a datacenter, LEO, cislunar space, a lunar habitat, and a Mars transfer. Choose a layer to see the job it performs.
These are product architecture concepts, not claims of an operational network.
A crew-health alert, a bulk science dataset, and a software update should not receive identical routing behavior. The demo below shows how destination, urgency, disruption, and path type change the network plan.
OffWorld Grid is strongest as infrastructure software: neutral between providers, deeply aware of contacts and disruption, and useful from Earth cloud to deep-space edge.
Endpoint identity, credentials, policy domains, data classification, authorization, and service entitlements.
Known and predicted communication windows, provider availability, topology, route constraints, and schedules.
Bundle-aware store-and-forward routing for intermittent connectivity, long delays, one-way periods, and multi-hop delivery.
Onboard or surface caching, filtering, queue management, compression, policy execution, and autonomous local decisions.
Applications specify intent and deadlines; the grid exposes route status, delivery receipts, path changes, and usage.
Normalize provider services, SLAs, pricing, capacity, contacts, and reservation interfaces into a common abstraction.
End-to-end queue depth, custody state, route health, latency budget, congestion, delivery confidence, and anomaly alerts.
Mission priority, security, cost ceilings, sovereign/data constraints, preferred providers, and graceful-degradation rules.
Usage metering, provider settlement, mission chargeback, immutable delivery records, and auditability across the route.
Make applications network-aware without requiring every software team to become experts in every space link protocol.
NASA describes DTN as a suite of protocols for end-to-end delivery through networks where links can be delayed or disrupted. CCSDS describes the Bundle Protocol as the main internetworking protocol in the Solar System Internetwork concept, using message-oriented store-and-forward behavior.
NASA’s LunaNet framework is explicitly designed around interoperable communications and navigation services from multiple providers. OffWorld Grid should complement standards-based systems like this as orchestration software, never imply ownership of LunaNet or replacement of public standards.
A space-infrastructure site can lose credibility instantly by presenting fictional operational capacity as current fact. The concept stays explicit about what exists today and what the product would need to build or integrate.
The site does not claim OffWorld Grid owns satellites, relays, ground stations, lunar towers, or deep-space assets.
NASA and LunaNet are referenced only as standards/architecture context. No partnership, certification, or government endorsement is implied.
Physics wins. Light-time, contact geometry, weather, capacity, and provider state shape every route.
The network should use interoperable standards wherever practical so mission customers are not trapped inside one proprietary path.
This prototype turns a mission/network requirement into a concise engineering intake brief. A production company would then map that requirement to providers, standards, edge nodes, security, and a route architecture.
Earth cloud. Ground station. Orbital relay. Lunar edge. Mars queue. The mission should ask for delivery — not manually stitch every hop together.